KnowledgeBase Archive

An Archive of Early Microsoft KnowledgeBase Articles

View on GitHub

Q309096: MCSE Readiness Review Exam 70-219: Designing a Microsoft Windows

Article: Q309096
Product(s): Microsoft Press
Version(s): 
Operating System(s): 
Keyword(s): kbdocfix kbdocerr
Last Modified: 15-JUL-2002

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this article applies to:

- MSPRESS MCSE Readiness Review Exam 70-219 Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure ISBN 0-7356-1364-8 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY
=======

This article contains comments, corrections, and information about known errors
relating to the Microsoft Press book MCSE Readiness Review Exam 70-219:
Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure, ISBN
0-7356-1364-8.

The following topics are covered:

- Page 23: Incorrect Diagram

- Page 29: Correction To Question 70-219.01.04.001's Answers

- Page 29: Austin Should Be Richmond

- Pages 98 and 100: Corrections To Question 70-219.03.03.001

MORE INFORMATION
================

Page 23: Incorrect Diagram
--------------------------

In the diagram on page 23, the cd.litwareinc.com and dvd.litwareinc.com domains
are incorrectly placed under the proseware.com domain.

They should be placed under the litwareinc.com domain.


Page 29: Correction To Question 70-219.01.04.001's Answers
----------------------------------------------------------

On page 29, in question 70-219.01.04.001, the correct answer should be B, not D.

Change the answers to be:
"Correct Answers: B
...
B. Correct: Designing the OU hierarchy by location is appropriate if management
of IT with a domain is handled according to the location of the objects being
managed, which is the case here.
...
D. Incorrect: The question provides no information regarding business functions
of various groups within the company. In general, OU hierarchy should be based
on geographic location, rather than business function, as geographic locations
are less likely to change."


Page 29: Austin Should Be Richmond
----------------------------------

There is an error on page 29, in choice D above "Objective 1.4 Answers".

Change:
"D. Design three OUs, a parent OU representing the Austin location, and two child
OUs representing the Chicago and Austin locations."

To:
"D. Design three OUs, a parent OU representing the Austin location, and two child
OUs representing the Chicago and Richmond locations."


Pages 98 and 100: Corrections To Question 70-219.03.03.001
----------------------------------------------------------

For pages 98 and 100, in question 70-219-.03.03.001, remove paragraph B on each
page:

"B. Within each division, create an OU for each job category. Link a GPO to each
job category-based OU." (page 98)

"B. Incorrect: If you create an OU for each job category and link a GPO to each
job category at the division level, each job category OU in the division
inherits all the GPOs and you would then need to use security groups to filter
group policy in order to influence the appropriate users." (page 100)


Microsoft Press is committed to providing informative and accurate books. All
comments and corrections listed above are ready for inclusion in future
printings of this book. If you have a later printing of this book, it may
already contain most or all of the above corrections.

Additional query words: TKBOOK RRBOOK WIN2K 0-7356-1364-8 SPEALMAN

======================================================================
Keywords          : kbdocfix kbdocerr 
Technology        : kbMSPressSearch
Version           : :
Issue type        : kbinfo

=============================================================================

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

Copyright Microsoft Corporation 1986-2002.