Q133492: Dual Channel PCI SCSI Adapters
Article: Q133492
Product(s): Microsoft Windows NT
Version(s):
Operating System(s):
Keyword(s):
Last Modified: 08-AUG-2001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this article applies to:
- Microsoft Windows NT Server version 3.1
- Microsoft Windows NT Workstation version 3.1
- Microsoft Windows NT Advanced Server, version 3.1
- Microsoft Windows NT Workstation versions 3.5, 3.51
- Microsoft Windows NT Server versions 3.5, 3.51
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY
=======
You can usually get better performance out of any SCSI device using a
multiplexed dual-channel PCI SCSI adapters. This article describes the SCSI
adapter and its advantages.
MORE INFORMATION
================
Multiplexed dual-channel PCI SCSI adapters are two SCSI controllers on one card.
The controllers often share a single interrupt, but each has its own I/O address
and interface. Although typical SCSI adapters use a single RISC processor, a
dual-channel SCSI adapter has two RISC processors (with each processor
controlling its own SCSI bus).
There are several reasons for using dual-channel PCI SCSI adapters, but the main
benefit is a dual-channel controller saves one slot over two single controllers.
By using one controller that switches between channels, dual- channel adapters
can support up to 14 devices while theoretically providing the same throughput
as a single-channel SCSI-2 adapter (which can support just seven devices). On a
dual-channel adapter, the two SCSI buses operate independently. Data is
transferred across the PCI bus by one controller at a time, but there is no
throughput loss because the PCI bus operates much faster than the two SCSI buses
combined. This assumes an aggregate SCSI-2 transfer rate of 20 MB per second (2
channels x 10MB per channel), compared with the 132 MB per second burst-mode
speed of the 33 mHz PCI bus.
Software-based disk striping, disk duplexing, and RAID support also work better
with dual-channel SCSI adapters. Disk striping offers the best performance if
there are multiple disk drives without disk duplexing or RAID enabled.
Dual-channel SCSI adapters can assume two basic configurations during operation.
The first distributes devices equally between the two controllers. The second
one takes a hint from dual-channel EIDE (Enhanced IDE) controllers. Slower
devices such as scanners, printers, CD-ROM drives and tape drives are placed on
one channel, whereas faster devices such as hard disks and optical disks are
placed on the other channel. Separating slow and fast devices works better when
not using striping, duplexing, or RAID because each channel can run at the most
efficient speed for the devices attached to it. Microsoft Windows 95 and Windows
NT take better advantage of the dual-channel adapters because they can issue
multiple disk requests simultaneously.
Additional query words: prodnt 3.10 dual-scsi
======================================================================
Keywords :
Technology : kbWinNTsearch kbWinNTWsearch kbWinNT351search kbWinNT350search kbWinNTW350 kbWinNTW350search kbWinNTW351search kbWinNTW351 kbWinNTW310 kbWinNTSsearch kbWinNTS351 kbWinNTS350 kbWinNTS310 kbWinNTAdvSerSearch kbWinNTAdvServ310 kbWinNTS351search kbWinNTS350search kbWinNTS310search kbWinNT310Search kbWinNTW310Search
=============================================================================
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.
Copyright Microsoft Corporation 1986-2002.