KnowledgeBase Archive

An Archive of Early Microsoft KnowledgeBase Articles

View on GitHub

Q129565: PC WSPlus: Change of Status Not Always Reflected in POF File

Article: Q129565
Product(s): Microsoft Schedule+ for Windows
Version(s): WINDOWS:1.0
Operating System(s): 
Keyword(s): 
Last Modified: 19-DEC-1999

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this article applies to:

- Microsoft Schedule+ for Windows, version 1.0 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SYMPTOMS
========

The access control list (.POF file) can become out of date when you change an
assistant's status (friendly name change, delete the user, etc.) in the Admin
program.

CAUSE
=====

When you select an assistant, the selection will be accurately recorded in the
access control list. However, if the assistant's status is subsequently changed,
the access control list will not be updated and will be out of date.

It is unreasonable to periodically check the access control list for accuracy;
therefore, it will not be updated in future releases.


The POF files contain Assistant routing information in the specific user's
record, if one is designated by the user and information about free/busy times
for users on the local postoffice. There is also a POF file for each external PO
defined.

Additional query words: schedule plus 1.00 POF

======================================================================
Keywords          :  
Technology        : kbScheduleSearch kbSchedule100
Version           : WINDOWS:1.0

=============================================================================

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.