KnowledgeBase Archive

An Archive of Early Microsoft KnowledgeBase Articles

View on GitHub

Q112098: PC MMTA: Err Msg: 999:55 Drive in Use. Attempting to Use…

Article: Q112098
Product(s): Microsoft Mail For PC Networks
Version(s): 3.2
Operating System(s): 
Keyword(s): 
Last Modified: 16-NOV-1999

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this article applies to:

- Microsoft Mail Multitasking MTA, version 3.2 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SYMPTOMS
========

If you use dynamic drive connections when you run version 3.2 of the Microsoft
Mail Multitasking Message Transfer Agent (MTA) under OS/2 (version 1.3 or
later), NetWare 3.11 or 3.12 file servers, or the Novell redirector for OS/2
(version 1.3 or later), the following error message may appear:

  999:55 Drive in use. Attempting to use local or mapped drive.

CAUSE
=====

This error results from a problem in the Novell redirector for OS/2. The problem
is that the drive connections are not closed properly.

RESOLUTION
==========

To obtain the latest update to the NetWare Requestor for OS/2, contact Novell at
(800) 638-9273.



Additional query words: 3.20

======================================================================
Keywords          :  
Technology        : kbMailSearch kbZNotKeyword3 kbMailMMTA320
Version           : :3.2

=============================================================================

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.