KnowledgeBase Archive

An Archive of Early Microsoft KnowledgeBase Articles

View on GitHub

Q60488: Apparent Failure of _memavl() Caused by printf() Allocation

Article: Q60488
Product(s): See article
Version(s): 6.00   | 6.00
Operating System(s): MS-DOS | OS/2
Keyword(s): ENDUSER| | mspl13_c
Last Modified: 15-APR-1990

The printf() statement makes a call to malloc() the first time it is
called within a program. Due to this allocation, _memavl() may seem to
return an incorrect value in some cases.

If a call to _memavl() is made within or before the first printf()
statement in a program, subsequent malloc() calls cannot allocate as
much memory as _memavl() suggests.

The workaround is to make the call to printf() before your call to
_memavl(), or make another call to _memavl() after printf() to
determine your true maximum allocation.

The following code demonstrates the problem:

#include<malloc.h>
#include<stdio.h>

size_t mavl;
char *ptr;

void main(void)
{
// printf("If included, this line solves the problem.\n");

   printf("memory available=%u \n",mavl=_memavl());

   if ((ptr=(char *)malloc(mavl))==NULL)
     printf("Not as much memory available as we thought!");
}

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

Copyright Microsoft Corporation 1986-2002.